Thursday, 22 October 2026
16:00 Keynote by Philippe Sormani
Rewilding the Lab: Instructive Evidence from Post-normal Practice
Venue: The National Library of Latvia, Conference Center, Level -1
Address: Mūkusalas iela 3, Riga
Rewilding the Lab: Instructive Evidence from Post-Normal Practice
Philippe Sormani
(STS lab, University of Lausanne / Immersive Arts Space, Zurich University of the Arts)
Laboratory work routinely leads to scientific findings and technological innovations. How? From the 1970s onwards, ethnographic studies have described “research in the making” in answer to the raised question. Ethnographic descriptions of science-at-work recovered the multiplicity of methods, prosaic and protracted, that lab work routinely draws upon, in and its everyday practice. As a sociotechnical endeavour, this multiplicity proved irreducible to any single ideal of scientific method or formal model of (physical) reality, not to mention overly virtuous pictures of the individual scientist. Also, for an evolving set of laboratory methods to take hold of society more broadly, society had to be controlled and construed in its image, be it Pasteur’s hygiene protocols for livestock breeding (Latour, 1987) or digital infrastructure for “autonomous vehicle” testing (Marres & Stark, 2020).
Shouldn’t there be limits to “laboratizing the world” (Guggenheim, 2012), however? Science, technology, and industry indeed happen to be ecologically embedded, environmentally consequential, and interestingly contingent. In a programmatic paper, Funtowicz and Ravetz (1993) coined the metaphor of the “reinvasion of the laboratory by nature” (p. 741) to highlight the self-destructive tendencies of overextended technological systems. As an alternative model, they pleaded for “post-normal science” in public policy expertise, a model that re-embedded scientific expertise in “extended peer review” in response to ecological crisis, environmental and existential, factual and normative. Thirty years on, the spectre of polycrisis, multiple “co-existence trials” and contradictory responses to them, including both calls for radical change and hyper-normalization of everyday routines, beg the question of political engagement and adequate expertise, if not “post-normal practice” and ideology critique (e.g., Marres, 2025; Sormani, 2024; Thorpe, 2022).
Against this backdrop, the present talk exemplifies and reflects on “rewilding the lab” as a heuristic move of reflexive ethnography, on the one hand, and a performative intervention of critical interest, on the other. Ethnographically, the talk revisits a series of “normal experiments” in and across art, science, and technology. Each of the revisited experiments lays claim to an independent, abstract and yet real-worldly phenomenon (e.g., a “material property”, a “virtual reality,” an “artificial intelligence”), regardless of its local production, mediated expression, and multiple contingencies. Conversely, the reflexive involvement of the video ethnographer will be explicated for its heuristic value, allowing us to make explicit just that circumstantial production, in and as its ordinarily constitutive practices – in situ and in vivo. Critically, then, the talk probes reflexive involvement for alternative aesthetics, including other kinds of sociotechnical arrangement, if not “vibrant experimentalism” (Marres, 2026). As a performative intervention, it will allow us to reflect on intertwined genealogies of laboratory ethnography, evidence, and ecology, while considering recent pleas for art, science, and technology studies (e.g., Rogers et al., 2021) – experimental or other.
References
· Funtowicz, S.O. & Ravetz, J.R. (1993) “Science for the Post-Normal Age,” Futures 25(7):735–755.
· Guggenheim, M. (2012) “Laboratizing and de-laboratizing the world: changing sociological concepts for places of knowledge production,” History of the Human Sciences 25(1):99–118.
· Latour, B. (1987) “Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World,” in Knorr Cetina, K. & M. Mulkay (Eds.) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage, pp. 141-170.
· Marres, N. (2025) “The Postnormal Society: On Trials of Co-Existence in Everyday Environments.” Preprints SocArXiv 1–25. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/
· Marres, N. (2026) “The Second Creation and the Destruction of Worlds”, The Ideas Letter #72 “La fin.” Available at: https://www.theideasletter.
· Marres, N. & D. Stark (2020) “Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing,” The British Journal of Sociology 71(3):423-443.
· Rogers, H. S., Halpern, M.K., Hannah, D. & K. De Ridder-Vignone (Eds.) (2021) Routledge Handbook of Art, Science and Technology Studies. London & New York: Routledge.
· Sormani, P. (2024) “Renormalizing Science? Postanalytic Inquiry for Post-Normal Times*”, Ethnographic Studies 20:268–295.
· Thorpe, C. (2022) Sociology in Post-Normal Times. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Philippe Sormani (PhD in Sociology) is a Senior Researcher at the STS Lab at University of Lausanne and the Immersive Arts Space (IAS) at Zurich University of the Arts. Drawing on science, technology and media studies, he has published on experimentation in and across different fields of activity, ranging from experimental physics to artistic experiments and technology demonstrations. Currently, he is experimenting with “extended reality” (at IAS), while (re-)engaging “new AI” (at STS Lab and beyond). Key publications include Respecifying Lab Ethnography (Routledge 2016), the co-edited volume Practicing Art/Science(Routledge 2019), and “Interfacing AlphaGo” (Social Studies of Science, 2023). He also is an affiliated member of CEMS/EHESS in Paris.
Respondent:
Ainārs Kamoliņš – a contemporary Latvian philosopher, curator, and researcher whose work bridges early modern philosophy with the natural sciences, biotechnology, and media art. Educated at the University of Latvia and the University of Aberdeen, he works with the Latvian Academy of Culture. As a long-time collaborator with the RIXC Center for New Media Culture, he focuses on the intersection of biological processes and technoscientific practices. His published books include Diaries: Spinoza’s Poetics (2014) and The Philosophy of Furniture (2021). Beyond academia, he brings philosophy to the public as a creative journalist for Radio NABA and through multimedia performing arts, including writing a stage adaptation of Søren Kierkegaard for the Latvian National Theatre.