RIXC ART SCIENCE FESTIVAL 2026
Rewilding the Lab: Instructive Evidence from Post-Normal Practice
Philippe Sormani
(STS lab, University of Lausanne / Immersive Arts Space, Zurich University of the Arts)
Laboratory work routinely leads to scientific findings and technological innovations. How? From the 1970s onwards, ethnographic studies have described “research in the making” in answer to the raised question. Ethnographic descriptions of science-at-work recovered the multiplicity of methods, prosaic and protracted, that lab work routinely draws upon, in and its everyday practice. As a sociotechnical endeavour, this multiplicity proved irreducible to any single ideal of scientific method or formal model of (physical) reality, not to mention overly virtuous pictures of the individual scientist. Also, for an evolving set of laboratory methods to take hold of society more broadly, society had to be controlled and construed in its image, be it Pasteur’s hygiene protocols for livestock breeding (Latour, 1987) or digital infrastructure for “autonomous vehicle” testing (Marres & Stark, 2020).
Shouldn’t there be limits to “laboratizing the world” (Guggenheim, 2012), however? Science, technology, and industry indeed happen to be ecologically embedded, environmentally consequential, and interestingly contingent. In a programmatic paper, Funtowicz and Ravetz (1993) coined the metaphor of the “reinvasion of the laboratory by nature” (p. 741) to highlight the self-destructive tendencies of overextended technological systems. As an alternative model, they pleaded for “post-normal science” in public policy expertise, a model that re-embedded scientific expertise in “extended peer review” in response to ecological crisis, environmental and existential, factual and normative. Thirty years on, the spectre of polycrisis, multiple “co-existence trials” and contradictory responses to them, including both calls for radical change and hyper-normalization of everyday routines, beg the question of political engagement and adequate expertise, if not “post-normal practice” and ideology critique (e.g., Marres, 2025; Sormani, 2024; Thorpe, 2022).
Against this backdrop, the present talk exemplifies and reflects on “rewilding the lab” as a heuristic move of reflexive ethnography, on the one hand, and a performative intervention of critical interest, on the other. Ethnographically, the talk revisits a series of “normal experiments” in and across art, science, and technology. Each of the revisited experiments lays claim to an independent, abstract and yet real-worldly phenomenon (e.g., a “material property”, a “virtual reality,” an “artificial intelligence”), regardless of its local production, mediated expression, and multiple contingencies. Conversely, the reflexive involvement of the video ethnographer will be explicated for its heuristic value, allowing us to make explicit just that circumstantial production, in and as its ordinarily constitutive practices – in situ and in vivo. Critically, then, the talk probes reflexive involvement for alternative aesthetics, including other kinds of sociotechnical arrangement, if not “vibrant experimentalism” (Marres, 2026). As a performative intervention, it will allow us to reflect on intertwined genealogies of laboratory ethnography, evidence, and ecology, while considering recent pleas for art, science, and technology studies (e.g., Rogers et al., 2021) – experimental or other.
References:
Funtowicz, S.O. & Ravetz, J.R. (1993) “Science for the Post-Normal Age,” Futures 25(7):735–755.
Guggenheim, M. (2012) “Laboratizing and de-laboratizing the world: changing sociological concepts for places of knowledge production,” History of the Human Sciences 25(1):99–118.
Latour, B. (1987) “Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World,” in Knorr Cetina, K. & M. Mulkay (Eds.) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage, pp. 141-170.
Marres, N. (2025) “The Postnormal Society: On Trials of Co-Existence in Everyday Environments.” Preprints SocArXiv 1–25. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/xupgf_v1 (Accessed 10 June 2026).
Marres, N. (2026) “The Second Creation and the Destruction of Worlds”, The Ideas Letter #72 “La fin.” Available at: https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/the-second-creation-and-the-destruction-of-worlds/#41552b93-1c80-449a-abee-ef25a623f40d-link (Accessed 20 September 2026).
Marres, N. & D. Stark (2020) “Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing,” The British Journal of Sociology 71(3):423-443.
Rogers, H. S., Halpern, M.K., Hannah, D. & K. De Ridder-Vignone (Eds.) (2021) Routledge Handbook of Art, Science and Technology Studies. London & New York: Routledge.
Sormani, P. (2024) “Renormalizing Science? Postanalytic Inquiry for Post-Normal Times*”, Ethnographic Studies 20:268–295.
Thorpe, C. (2022) Sociology in Post-Normal Times. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Philippe Sormani, Senior Researcher at the STS Lab at the University of Lausanne and the Immersive Arts Space at Zurich University of the Arts, will deliver the festival’s opening keynote. His research addresses experimentation across scientific and artistic fields, from experimental physics to artistic practices, artificial intelligence, and extended reality. In his keynote, Sormani revisits experiments and the circumstances shaping their results, exploring alternative aesthetics of experimentation and sociotechnical arrangements.
The keynote respondent, Ainārs Kamoliņš, is a philosopher, curator, and doctoral researcher at the Latvian Academy of Culture whose work connects philosophy, natural sciences, biotechnology, and media art. Together, they will discuss scientific experimentation as an ecologically embedded, environmentally consequential, and situated practice, raising questions about expertise in times of multiple crises.